Forum Forum Muzyczne Hip-hop, Techno i inne Strona Główna
FAQ :: Szukaj :: Użytkownicy :: Grupy :: Galerie  :: Profil :: Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomo¶ci :: Zaloguj  :: Rejestracja


More likely as not, it will be a

Zobacz poprzedni temat :: Zobacz następny temat
Napisz nowy tematOdpowiedz do tematu Forum Forum Muzyczne Hip-hop, Techno i inne Strona Główna -> Zgłoszenia na Moderatora i Redaktora
Autor Wiadomo¶ć
adixnjxcnj
Słuchacz



Doł±czył: 23 Gru 2014
Posty: 19
Przeczytał: 0 tematów

Ostrzeżeń: 0/5
Sk±d: Ukraine

PostWysłany: Czw 13:08, 01 Sty 2015 Temat postu: More likely as not, it will be a

I dont worry about that, for I realize this is an unstable situation .
umi zero black
Sooner or umi zero black later, beyond my ability to predict, impacting rain drops, or a gust of wind, or a bug, will dislodge [link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
those bits, and ultimately they will reach the ground and stability Why radioactivity at all? Overall, there is, in general, a balance between the strong nuclear force trying to hold everything in an atomic nucleus (neutrons and protons) together, and the electrostatic positive charges of those protons trying to push things apart However, things can reach a state where an imbalance happens Then things eventually go poof as the strong nuclear force is no longer adequate to keep everything together as one big happy nucleus family I dont dispute that radioactivity exists, or that radioactive decay is an observed physical process and follows a defined mathematical progression It happens but why?Mystery Number One is why does something that we term radioactive (say a lump of something Ill call Substance X) break down or decay when it does? I mean, here we have an atom of Substance X, it is unstable, it will decay eventually into something thats not radioactive and hence something that is stable But, this unstable Substance X atom exists for perhaps only microseconds before decaying, but it could last in an unstable state for a year, a decade, hundreds, thousands, millions, or even billions of years, and then all of a sudden go poof and decay, giving off alpha particles, beta particles or gamma rays in the process What caused that specific moment to be the poof moment? What was different at that exact moment from all those moments that preceded it? There must be causality – physical science is founded on the principal of cause and effect Perhaps there is something in the unstable atoms nucleus trying to escape but lacking the energy to do so, but perhaps finally succeeding via quantum tunneling, or maybe the atom is by chance impacted by an unknown form of matter (dark matter perhaps?) causing the breakup or decay Is there anything you could do that would affect poof moments? If so, then perhaps we have a handle on the cause for the poof .
umi zero
Take a lump of Substance umi zero X (presumably trying to manipulate just one atom of Substance X is going to be technologically too challenging), and measure the rate of poof moments Say its one poof per minute Now try to alter that rate You can take that lump of Substance X and shake it, bake it, boil it, freeze it, hammer it, pulverize it, blow it up with TNT, put it in the dark or shine lights on it, soak it in acid or otherwise chemically react with it, place it in an intense magnetic field or whirl it around in a centrifuge, shoot it into outer space and you will not alter those poof moments one jot So, what causes these totally unpredictable poof moments? Its surely not an everyday, common, physical or chemical process Mystery Number Two is that radioactive decay marches to the tune of a mathematical equation, known as a half-life equation (the half-life being unique to each and every radioactive substance) It happens Again, why?Radioactive decay is measured in half-lives; the time it takes ½ of the unstable radioactivity present to decay to a stable state .
buy umi zero
So you start with say 1000 buy umi zero radioactive atoms One unit of time later, you have 500 radioactive atoms One unit of time later you have 250 radioactive atoms left (and 750 stable ones) One more unit of time sees you down to 125 radioactive atoms (It gets interesting next unit – will 62 or 63 atoms go poof?) Somehow its almost as if the atoms somehow have clocks and know when to, or not to, decay Say just before one unit of time has elapsed and 500 atoms have gone poof, will one atom somehow think to itself, hold on, I have to wait now for the next unit of time before I can do my poof thing otherwise Ill upset the precise mathematical half-life apple cart! I mean its almost as if an unstable (radioactive) atomic nucleus knows when its their turn to decay when they are with a crowd of their peers I would have thought that if you have your 1000 radioactive Substance X atoms and since they (the atoms) arent mathematicians and cant calculate then youd expect their decay – their poof – they would not follow a precise mathematical formula I mean, say the first 500 atoms decay in one unit of time Doesnt it make sense therefore for the second 500 atoms to decay in the next unit of time? Or, if things are truly random and unpredictable, no cause and effect, then 10 atoms might go poof in one unit of time, then perhaps another 50 in the second unit, another 7 in the third unit, then lots of poofs, say 103 worth in the fourth unit of time; maybe just one in the fifth unit of time, etc No, theres something strange going on here Either that or maybe you have to assume intelligent, communicating, all-knowing unstable nuclei Imagine this conversation as an explanation Jane: Hi Clive Clive: Hi Jane Jane: Look Clive, one of us must go poof now in order to keep this half-life relationship in sync Clive: Thats okay Jane, Ill go poof – see ya Jane: Thanks a bunch! Of course the above conversation is hardly one that anyone could take seriously!Say you have a bucket filled with 1000 ping pong balls and you pull them out one at a time Clearly youre not going to end up with anything resembling the half-life mathematics of radioactive decay More likely as not, it will be a straight forward equation – one ping pong ball decays (is removed from the bucket) every unit of time, and 1000 units of time later, the bucket will be empty (assuming you dont get tired, in which case it might be slightly more than 1000 time units)!Anyway, back to our half-life decay of our 1000 atoms of Substance X At zero time units, we have 1000 radioactive atoms .
umi zero black pre-sale umi zero 5.0 smartphone 1920x1080 android 4.4.2 mtk6592 turbo octa-core 2.0ghz 2gb ram 16gb rom 13mp(black) cell phone pre-sale umi zero 5.0 smartphone 1920x1080 android 4.4.2 mtk6592 turbo octa-core 2.0ghz 2
After one time unit, its 500 radioactive atoms; after two time units its 250 radioactive atoms; after three time units its 125 radioactive atoms; after four time units we have left 62 or 63 radioactive atoms; after five time units its either 31 or 32 radioactive atoms; after six time units we have only 15 or 16 unstable atoms left; after seven time units were down to 7 or 8 radioactive atoms; after eight time units its a lonely 3 or 4 radioactive atoms; after nine time units its only 1 or 2 left; after ten time units umi zero black pre-sale umi zero 5.0 smartphone 1920x1080 android 4.4.2 mtk6592 turbo octa-core 2.0ghz 2gb ram 16gb rom 13mp(black) cell phone pre-sale umi zero 5.0 smartphone 1920x1080 android 4.4.2 mtk6592 turbo octa-core 2.0ghz 2 its none or one; and after eleven time units, we have 1000 stable atoms and no unstable atoms of our former Substance X So, in this case, its a maximum of eleven time units to 100% stability Its predictable given the mathematics that if ½ of a radioactive substance decays in a certain unit of time, ½ of whats left will ditto decay in the next time unit, and so on There is an analogy given to illustrate this half-life relationship Imagine 1000 humans in a (rather large) room Each human is given a standard coin At the word flip, each human flips their coin If its heads, they leave the room; if its tails they stay Obviously, after one flip half the humans leave Then someone says flip again, and history repeats Heads you leave; tails you stay Of course after round two, 750 humans have left the room (decayed) After flip round three, 875 humans have left, and so on Is this a valid analogy where humans equal radioactive atoms; coin flipping (heads or tails) represents a poof vs a non-poof and leaving the room is the state of decay? Hardly! Firstly, you could structure that exercise such that after the first cull everyone left in the room took a tea break The exercise didnt undertake the second culling – the second flip – until 18 units later (it was a long tea break) Then the remaining 250 broke for lunch, not resuming until a further 38 units of time had elapsed Of course by then it was time for afternoon tea – well you see the relationship of 50% down and out per unit of time has been shattered well and truly!Further, in the human exercise analogy, there is a must factor absent in normal radioactive decay In the exercise, you must have a coin; you must flip it; you must leave the room if you flip heads, etc The regulation is obvious What regulates the real radioactive decay isnt obvious Radioactivity makes little logical sense So, whats the hidden or real message or meaning? It seems to me that we have yet another example of how the behavior of the one is in stark contrast to the behavior of the many (which, come to think of it, can be easily extrapolated to human populations!) If one atom is part of a collective mob, it has to go along with the madding crowd If the atom is by its lonesome, it can do whatever it damn well pleases – do its own thing in modern lingo A population of 1000 Substance X atoms entirely decays in a maximum of eleven time units One Substance X atom however is subject to no such decay certainty It might decay in three time units, or last thirty, or three hundred before its poof with destiny You couldnt make a prediction in advance


Post został pochwalony 0 razy
Powrót do góry
Zobacz profil autora
Wy¶wietl posty z ostatnich:
Napisz nowy tematOdpowiedz do tematu Forum Forum Muzyczne Hip-hop, Techno i inne Strona Główna -> Zgłoszenia na Moderatora i Redaktora Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Strona 1 z 1


Skocz do:  
Nie możesz pisać nowych tematów
Nie możesz odpowiadać w tematach
Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów
Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów
Nie możesz głosować w ankietach


fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB (C) 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Theme Retred created by JR9 for stylerbb.net Bearshare
Regulamin